

Going ViralOctober 18, 2016 |
In the age of social media, fears and rumours about outbreaks and epidemics can quickly spread out of control. How can health officials help contain the panic? By Mike Ives
Quick Read
Going ViralOctober 18, 2016 |
In the age of social media, fears and rumours about outbreaks and epidemics can quickly spread out of control. How can health officials help contain the panic? By Mike Ives
In the age of social media, fears and rumours about outbreaks and epidemics can quickly spread out of control. How can health officials help contain the panic? By Mike Ives
In the spring of 2014, Vietnam’s state-controlled news media reported that dozens of children had died after turning up at hospitals in the capital, Hanoi, with rashes and high fevers. Doctors said the cause was a measles outbreak – the worst in Vietnamese history.
Parents of victims rushed onto Facebook to share their grief and outrage. So did their friends and neighbours, who wanted to know how the outbreak was spreading, and whether it was even safe to take children to hospital. The authorities distributed information about the measles deaths via leaflets, loudspeaker bulletins and updates on the health ministry’s website, recalls a nurse at a state-run hospital in Hanoi, who requested anonymity in order to speak frankly. “But there was so much information online that some people became panicked.”
Vietnam is a one-party state that has responded efficiently to many natural disasters and health emergencies. During a 2005 outbreak of avian flu, for example, the Vietnamese agriculture minister famously ate chicken on national television in an effort to calm public fears about widespread poultry infections. But when the 2014 measles scandal broke, millions of Vietnamese were using Facebook, compared to almost none just a few years earlier. And the government, which sporadically blocks the network, was unable to extinguish a Facebook-fuelled bush-fire of fear, anger and recrimination that swept the nation.
Image: © Melvin Galapon
Since its public launch 10 years ago, Twitter has been used as a social networking platform among friends, an instant messaging service for smartphone users and a promotional tool for corporations and politicians. But it’s also been an invaluable source of data for researchers and scientists – like myself – who want to study how humans feel and function within complex social systems
Since its public launch 10 years ago, Twitter has been used as a social networking platform among friends, an instant messaging service for smartphone users and a promotional tool for corporations and politicians. But it’s also been an invaluable source of data for researchers and scientists – like myself – who want to study how humans feel and function within complex social systems
Since its public launch 10 years ago, Twitter has been used as a social networking platform among friends, an instant messaging service for smartphone users and a promotional tool for corporations and politicians.
But it’s also been an invaluable source of data for researchers and scientists – like myself – who want to study how humans feel and function within complex social systems.
By analyzing tweets, we’ve been able to observe and collect data on the social interactions of millions of people “in the wild,” outside of controlled laboratory experiments.
It’s enabled us to develop tools for monitoring the collective emotions of large populations, find the happiest places in the United States and much more.
So how, exactly, did Twitter become such a unique resource for computational social scientists? And what has it allowed us to discover?
Image: Mixy Lorenzo via Flickr CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
When news breaks – whether the story of a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack or a natural disaster – people increasingly turn to the internet and social media. Individuals use Twitter and Facebook as primary sources for news and information
When news breaks – whether the story of a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack or a natural disaster – people increasingly turn to the internet and social media. Individuals use Twitter and Facebook as primary sources for news and information
Social media platforms – including Reddit, Wikipedia and other emerging outlets such as Snapchat – are distinct from traditional broadcast and print media. But they’ve become powerful tools for communicating rapidly and without intermediary gatekeepers, like editors.
The problem is that social media is also a great way to spread misinformation, too. Millions of Americans shape their ideas on complex and controversial scientific questions – things like personal genetic testing, genetically modified foods and their use of antibiotics – based on what they see on social media. Even many traditional news organizations and media outlets report incomplete aspects of scientific studies, or misinterpret the findings and highlight unusual claims. Once these items enter into the social media echo chamber, they’re amplified. The facts become lost in the shuffle of competing information, limited attention or both.
A recent workshop about Social Media Effects on Scientific Controversies that we convened through the Center for Mobile Communication Studies at Boston University fielded a panel of interdisciplinary experts to discuss their own experiences and research in communicating science online. These public scholars examined the extent to which social media has disrupted scientific understanding. Most indicated it’s more possible than ever for researchers to participate meaningfully in public debates and contribute to the creation and diffusion of scientific knowledge – but social media presents many pitfalls along the way.
Image: By Ibrahim.ID – Own work based on:file:F icon.svgfile:Twitter logo.svgfile:Twitter Logo Mini.svgfile:Blogger icon.svgfile:Digg.svgfile:Delicious.svgfile:Flickr.svgfile:Google plus icon.svgfile:Linkedin icon.svgfile:Instagram Shiny Icon.svgfile:Myspace icon.jpgfile:Openid.svgfile:Pinterest Shiny Icon.svgfile:Quora icon.pngfile:Sharethis.svgfile:Rss-feed.svgfile:Skype-icon.pngfile:StumbleUpon Logo.svgfile:Vimeo.svgfile:Soundcloud-logo-black.pngfile:Logo Youtube.svg, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=46074461
Conference Tweeting Rule Frustrates EcologistsAugust 20, 2015 |
Complaints ensued when attendees at an ecology meeting were asked to get permission before live-tweeting
Complaints ensued when attendees at an ecology meeting were asked to get permission before live-tweeting
To tweet or not to tweet? That was the question many ecologists struggled with at the annual meeting of the Ecological Society of America (ESA) last week in Baltimore, Maryland. Attendees at last year’s conference freely tweeted during researchers’ presentations, but this year they received a surprising and confusing tweet from the society the evening before the meeting started.
How We DieMarch 30, 2015 |
Recent stories on death and dying offer interesting perspectives on discussing, preparing for and coping with an inevitable part of all of our lives
Recent stories on death and dying offer interesting perspectives on discussing, preparing for and coping with an inevitable part of all of our lives
The BI at ASBHOctober 8, 2014 |
The Berman Institute will be well represented at the 16th annual meeting of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities, October 16-19 in San Diego. Watch for us on Twitter: #ASBH14
The Berman Institute will be well represented at the 16th annual meeting of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities, October 16-19 in San Diego. Watch for us on Twitter: #ASBH14
#NursingEthics Twitter Chat: Respect, Dignity, TrustJune 19, 2014 |
What respect, dignity and trust-related issues keep nurses up at night? Check out the storified version of our 2nd #NursingEthics Twitter chat
What respect, dignity and trust-related issues keep nurses up at night? Check out the storified version of our 2nd #NursingEthics Twitter chat
#NursingEthics Twitter ChatJune 5, 2014 |
If you missed our first #nursingethics twitter chat from Tuesday, June 3rd, check it out here. Our next #nursingethics chat will be held on Tuesday, June 17th 8-9pm EDT. Join the conversation!
If you missed our first #nursingethics twitter chat from Tuesday, June 3rd, check it out here. Our next #nursingethics chat will be held on Tuesday, June 17th 8-9pm EDT. Join the conversation!